Would it be possible to add a setting/option to restore Everything's previous search(es/tabs)?
Sometimes I need to close or restart Everything, and I often leave searches up in tabs as a reference/reminder for something I'm either actively working on, or monitoring, or need to get to. When Everything closes or the system shuts down, I lose all the searches, meaning I need to regularly copy/paste the searches into a note and re-paste when Everything opens next. Also in rare cases of a crash, whether system or software, software/Everything updates, etc.
Of course, not a big deal, just would be a nice setting to have! TIA
[Feature] Restore previous search(es) on startup
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2014 12:20 am
Re: [Feature] Restore previous search(es) on startup
History -> Restore Previous Session is in development.
Thank you for the suggestion.
Thank you for the suggestion.
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2014 12:20 am
Re: [Feature] Restore previous search(es) on startup
Oh I didn't even notice it there... fantastic! Great news, thanks for implementing.
-
- Posts: 687
- Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2022 5:01 pm
Re: [Feature] Restore previous search(es) on startup
For comparison in Mp3tag when you leave its Filter box [which is equivalent of Search Edit in Everything] with anything written in it and then close and re-open the program, then that something is still there - even if it was showing and still is yielding zero results
I would expect from Everything to be able to act in the same way, if not by default then by choice done somewhere in Options
I would expect from Everything to be able to act in the same way, if not by default then by choice done somewhere in Options
Re: [Feature] Restore previous search(es) on startup
You can set your Home search under Tools -> Options -> Home -> Search
(Use last value) will restore the previous search text.
(Use last value) will restore the previous search text.
-
- Posts: 687
- Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2022 5:01 pm
Re: [Feature] Restore previous search(es) on startup
So it is already possible, although buried within miriad of sub-options
Thank you for pointing it out to me
Thank you for pointing it out to me