(just rambling, from some time back, & i've only thought about it, a bit...)
a large filelist (7,111 chars) results in a, /displays/ a "blank" Searchbar
& a blank Tab "title" (if you will)
i'm pretty sure that is expected (problay after 1 or 2 or 4K, i'm thinking,
but just noting...
while we're here, why is filelist: SOOOO much more efficient then OR's ?
OR's start choking, almost immediately
but with a filelist: (177 items in this case) it's instant ?
- oh, because OR's need to actually go out & search for said files,
where filelist: simply needs to /LIST/ an already determined set
of filenames, & if they happen to exist, they're displayed, & if
the don't, they simply do not. so, that's part of it, but what
else is there... ?
why if you "Open" a File List (Ctrl+O)
do you then have a "Close File List" ability
but
if you "load" a file list (everything.exe -search-file-list)
you do not (have a "Close File List")
?
if you Open a File List
then click the 'X' button on the Searchbar
that "clears the search"
but does not "Close" the File List ?
- at least, at that point, the Close File List (menu option) is still "valid"
^--- i have to go over that again, because i didn't look at it, correctly
so when a File List is "Opened", your actions only pertain to the files in
that List
when a File List is "Opened", there is no 'X' on the Searchbar
when a File List is "Opened", the Tab reads "New Tab"
when a File List is "loaded", there IS an 'X' & the Tab is "blank"
in both cases, there is the potential for the Searchbar to /display/ as
"blank" (depending on if the search length is > maxlen...)
likewise, Searchbar "history", while it "exists" with both an Opened & a loaded
File List, in the case of an Opened list, you are performing said
(history [or new, for that matter]) searches based only on the files
in that Opened list,
where if you "loaded" a -search-file-list, any Searchbar History item will simply
replace ("close", if you will) the -search-file-list & perform the search anew
("globally", outside of any "List")
Why is filelist SOOOO much more efficient the OR's?
Re: Why is filelist SOOOO much more efficient the OR's?
ORs = partial file name search. (slow strstr search on each filename)while we're here, why is filelist: SOOOO much more efficient then OR's ?
filelist: = sorted full filename lookup. (instant binary search lookup)
Consider using regex: or startwith: or whole: for really large OR lists, it will be slightly faster.
An or list (DFA) is on my TODO list.
This loads the file list as if it was another database.why if you "Open" a File List (Ctrl+O)
do you then have a "Close File List" ability
Results are from the file list, not your local index.
-search-file-list foo.efu simply loads the file list into your search box.if you "load" a file list (everything.exe -search-file-list)
you do not (have a "Close File List")
?
It searches your existing database for a list of filenames.
Results are from your local index.
Open File List changes the database/index, not your search.if you Open a File List
then click the 'X' button on the Searchbar
that "clears the search"
but does not "Close" the File List ?
The opened file list filename is shown in the statusbar on the right.