Everything ftp read-write function,
Can you only choose whether to download it, and can you add an optional write - to - write function?
Everything ftp read-write function
Re: Everything ftp read-write function
The Everything ETP/FTP server is read-only.
Downloading is enabled by default, to disable FTP downloading:
Downloading is enabled by default, to disable FTP downloading:
- In Everything, from the Tools menu, click Options.
- Click the ETP/FTP Server tab on the left.
- Uncheck Allow file download.
- Click OK.
Re: Everything ftp read-write function
void wrote:The Everything ETP/FTP server is read-only.Downloading is enabled by default, to disable FTP downloading:I have on my TODO list an ETP/FTP upload option. However it is low priority.
- In Everything, from the Tools menu, click Options.
- Click the ETP/FTP Server tab on the left.
- Uncheck Allow file download.
- Click OK.
Editing and uploading functions are important, and these will be a complete FTP server.
Re: Everything ftp read-write function
Everything is not an FTP server it only provides its indexes by ftp protocol.zsh2708 wrote:void wrote:The Everything ETP/FTP server is read-only.Downloading is enabled by default, to disable FTP downloading:I have on my TODO list an ETP/FTP upload option. However it is low priority.
- In Everything, from the Tools menu, click Options.
- Click the ETP/FTP Server tab on the left.
- Uncheck Allow file download.
- Click OK.
Editing and uploading functions are important, and these will be a complete FTP server.
I don't see any need for an FTP write which also may give a lot of security issues.
There are enough free FTP servers available.
Re: Everything ftp read-write function
Agreed.horst.epp wrote: Everything is not an FTP server it only provides its indexes by ftp protocol.
I don't see any need for an FTP write which also may give a lot of security issues.
There are enough free FTP servers available.
And that's beside the fact that this would probably cause a security nightmare:
ETP server has most likely full control locally on the server and that would give any user the possibility to overwrite important system/sensitive/.. files.
EDIT: @horst.epp: I completely overlooked your which also may give a lot of security issues.
That makes my message completely redundant...
Now I agree even more